Harry Reid’s DREAM Act Gamble
Published on October 29th, 2010
By Joe Guzzardi
September 17, 2010
In a surprising act of political bravado, Senate Majority Leader Reid announced that he would attach controversial DREAM Act legislation to the 2011 defense authorization bill scheduled for a vote next week. On Friday, Reid filed cloture.
The DREAM Act would allow illegal alien students who have lived in the United States for at least five years and have graduated from high school or earned a graduate equivalency diploma (GED) to legalize their immigration status by pursuing a college education or serving in the U.S. military.
Many Americans consider the DREAM Act an amnesty that would allow so called students up to age 35 to apply and provide legalization to millions of non-students through chain migration.
Reid’s ploy comes at a time when he is locked in a tight race against his Republican challenger Sharron Angle and when Democrats in general face dim November reelection prospects.
Even Arizona Senator John McCain, a long time supporter of the DREAM Act and liberalized immigration laws, is critical and vowed not to vote for it. McCain challenged Reid on the feasibility of having immigration legislation attached to national defense.
McCain and his Republican colleague Utah’s Orrin Hatch call Reid’s maneuver “a transparent attempt to win an election,” meaning that the Democrats hope their last ditch effort for the DREAM Act will motivate Hispanic voters to turn out in large numbers.
Other Republicans are even more condemning and call Reid’s effort “despicable,” “offensive,” and “cynical”
Georgia Representative Phil Gingrey said: “It’s despicable, quite honestly. Sen. Reid – who we all know is in a very tough reelection battle – that he would use this and use the men and women in the military, who are at the tip of the spear, who have given their lives in the defense of our country, to really use them to try to force this passage of the DREAM Act so he can pander to a large Hispanic voting bloc in his state of Nevada is just deplorable, quite honestly.”
Said Utah Representative Jason Chaffetz:“There’s an emotional debate regarding immigration and we ought to have that discussion in Congress. But in this late hour, just before an election, to try to piggyback it to the defense bill is just offensive to a lot of people.”
Texas Representative Lamar Smith, the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, summed up Reid’s action as a “cynical pre-election ploy.”
The GOP’s objections are important because Reid will need some Republican support for the measure to avoid a filibuster.
Reid has at least one staunch ally: President Barack Obama. At the recent Congressional Hispanic Caucus gala dinner, Obama vowed to support of the DREAM Act and accused its opponents of stoking fear.
The stakes for the Democrats, and specifically Reid, are high. A survey commissioned by the Las Vegas Review-Journal, Nevada’s leading daily newspaper, found that residents are largely opposed to illegal immigration and believe that the state’s economy would be better without illegal workers. By promoting the DREAM Act, Reid is defying his constituents.
Given the DREAM Act’s long and unsuccessful history, the odds against the legislation passing are long.
The DREAM Act first appeared in 2001 and has been reintroduced multiple times in Congresses 107 through 111. In 2007, Senator Richard Durbin tried Reid’s trick. Durbin spearheaded a failed effort to bury the DREAM Act in S. 2919, also a defense authorization bill. Congressional critics perceived it then as they do now as non-germane to defense issues and it died quickly.
Reid has put not only himself but other Democratic Congressional incumbents at risk. Looking ahead to 2012, Obama may be imperiled also if the DREAM Act fails again.
Voters are angry, a phenomenon that apparently escapes the current Congress.
Joe Guzzardi has written editorial columns—mostly about immigration and related social issues – since 1990. He is a senior writing fellow for Californians for Population Stabilization (CAPS) and his columns have frequently been syndicated in various U.S. newspapers and websites. He can be reached at [email protected].